Naina Devidas Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2024:BHC-AUG:4708-DB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.523 of 2021 Smt. Nayana Devidas Patil

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others.

Mr. S.D. Hivrekar, advocate for petitioner Mr. P S Patil AGP for respondents-State.

.....

CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, JJ.

Dated : 4th March, 2024 .....

PER COURT :- 1.

Not on board. Called papers on mentioning.

2.

Learned advocate Mr. Hivarekar appearing for the petitioner submits that a written communication by the client i.e. Petitioner stating that the purpose of her petition has been served and, therefore, she be allowed to withdraw the petition. Said written communication is taken on record by marking Exhibit "A". 3.

In view of the said communication, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. ) ( SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. ) ...

aaa/-