Pritam Subhash Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 wp 8797.2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 965 WRIT PETITION NO.8797 OF 2021 PRITAM SUBHASH PATIL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner:

Mr. M. K. Bhosle h/f. Mr. Salok Amol M.

AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. K. N. Lokhande ...

CORAM:S. V. GANGAPURWALA & R. N. LADDHA, JJ.

DATE: 12th AUGUST, 2021 PER COURT:

1.

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was duly selected pursuant to the advertisement and his name appeared in the wait list. Many candidates issued with the appointment order had not joined. The petitioner is entitled to be considered in their place.

2.

The learned Counsel referred to the Judgment and Order passed in the Writ Petition No. 11843 of 2017 dated 04.05.2021. The respondents ought to have considered the petitioner for appointment.

2 wp 8797.2021 even as per the Judgment and Order of this Court in Writ Petition No. 11843 of 2017 dated 04.05.2021.

3.

The Wait List was prepared in the year-2016.

In the year-2021, it would be too late in a day to pass positive orders.

4.

The Judgment and Order in Writ Petition No. 11843 of 2017 dated 04.05.2021 is a matter of record. In the said Judgment also we had not directed issuance of the appointment order to any particular candidate. We had only said that, from the list, 33 posts should be filled in and we had passed the order as the petitioners therein had approached the Court before lapse of 1 year.

5.

In view of above, writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

[R. N. LADDHA, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] marathe