Santosh Ramdas Mahajan v. State Of Maharashtra

(1) 988 FA-1096.2002.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 988 FIRST APPEAL NO.1096 OF 2002 WITH CA/7901/2002 IN FA/1096/2002 SANTOSH RAMDAS MAHAJAN

VERSUS

MUSRODDIN JAINODDIN SHAIKH AND ANOTHER ...

None for the appellant.

Mr. R.D. Borde, Advocate holding for Mr. Uday Malte, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr. Amol Mali, Advocate holding for Mr. D.S. Bagul, Advocate for respondent No.2.

...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

12.01.2023.

ORDER:- 1.

None for the appellant.

2.

It appears that vide order dated 04.10.2022, last chance was given to the appellant for going on with the matter. However, despite such direction, none appeared for the appellant today.

3.

Thus, it appears that the appellant is not interested in proceeding with the matter. As such, the appeal stands dismissed for default alongwith the pending civil application. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde