Chandrakala Kashinath Bajaj v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

904-CA-5250-2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 904 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5250 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 13701 OF 2019 CHANDRAKALA KASHINATH BAJAJ

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Mr. D.R. Markad h/f. Mr. D.R. Jayabhar - Advocate for Applicant Mr. B.V. Virdhe - AGP for Respondent No.1 ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 16th June, 2023 PER COURT :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 1510 days, which appears to be caused due to her poor financial condition. The learned A.G.P. strongly opposed the application on the ground that, delay is not properly explained. The acquiring body though served, but remained absent. 3.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicant and for the reasons stated in the application, the application Pooja K.

1/2

904-CA-5250-2020 is allowed and the delay of 1510 days in this application stands condoned subject to condition that the applicant shall not claim any interest for the period of aforesaid delay. 4.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

5.

The application is accordingly disposed of.

[ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] JUDGE Pooja K.

2/2