Dadasaheb Pundalik Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra

922aba588.21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 922 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.588 OF 2021 DADASAHEB PUNDALIK PATIL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr.Thoke Dhananjay B APP for the Respondent-State : Mr. A.V.Deshmukh ...

CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE , J.

DATE : 3rd August, 2021.

P. C. :

1.

After arguing application for some time, when the Court was not inclined to grant pre-arrest bail, learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, submitted that applicant shall surrender before the Court of competent jurisdiction on 09th August, 2021. The 2.

Statement is accepted.

3.

For the reasons stated above, application is dismissed. 4.

It is clarified that the time granted to the applicant to surrender, shall not be construed as pre-arrest protection granted by this Court.

( SANDEEP K. SHINDE ) JUDGE mahajansb/