The State Of Maharashtra v. Prakash Sojar Andhare And ANR

42-delay.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 42 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8635 OF 2017 IN FAST/14600/2017 WITH CA/8637/2017 IN FAST/14661/2017 WITH CA/8639/2017 IN FAST/14675/2017 WITH CA/8641/2017 IN FAST/14664/2017 WITH CA/8643/2017 IN FAST/14656/2017 WITH CA/8645/2017 IN FAST/14671/2017 WITH CA/8647/2017 IN FAST/14667/2017 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

VERSUS

JAMBUWANT POPAT BHOSALE AND ANR ...

AGP for Applicant : Mr.S.S.Dande Mr.Santosh N Patne, Adv.,for respondents.

...

CORAM

: K. L. WADANE, J.

DATE :

9th October, 2017 ORDER:

1.

Heard Mr.Dande, learned AGP for the applicant State and Mr.Patne, learned Counsel appearing for the respondents.

2.

This is an application for condonation of 835 days delay caused in filing the present First Appeals. Mr. Dande, learned AGP submits that the above mentioned delay is caused due to procedural aspects to be 1/2

42-delay.odt followed by the appellant while presenting the appeals and due to administrative difficulties. Other side has no objection to condone the delay.

3.

Hence, for the reasons stated in the applications, the delay stands condoned. Civil Applications for condonation of delay are accordingly disposed of.

4.

In first appeals, issue notice to the respondents. Mr. Patne, the learned counsel waives notice for the respondents/claimants.

5.

Call for record and proceedings.

(K. L. WADANE, J.) JPC 2/2