Prashant Raosaheb Kohok And ORS v. Sulabai Babasaheb Kohok

CA-9870.16.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9870 OF 2016 IN SECOND APPEAL [STAMP] NO. 14341 OF 2016 Prashant Raosaheb Kohok and others .. Applicants versus Sulabai wd/o o Babasaheb Kohok .. Respondent --- Mr. Abhaykumar D. Ostwal, Advocate for applicants Mr. T. M. Tandale, Advocate for respondent CORAM :

SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE :

14th October, 2016 ORDER :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

Having regard to the reasons and the contents in the civil application, the same appear to carry lot of force particularly having regard to that the applicants no. 1 and 2 are minor and their cause is being prosecuted by their mother - applicant no. 3 after death of their father.

3.

Learned counsel for respondent opposes, however, veracity of the reasons in the application is not being countered by production of any material on record.

CA-9870.16.doc 4.

In the circumstances, delay stands condoned. Civil application stands granted and is disposed of. 5.

Interim relief, if any, to continue.

SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JUDGE pnd