← Library
Bombay High CourtMCA/133/2024application allowed

Prachi Rahul Kankal v. Rahul S/O Abhimanyu Kankal

2024-09-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker2 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:22811 133.24MCA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 133 OF 2024 ...

PRACHI RAHUL KANKAL

VERSUS

RAHUL S/O. ABHIMANYU KANKAL ...

Advocate for the applicant : Mr.R.R.Karpe a/w. Adv.Sagalgile P.J.

Advocate for the respondent : Adv.G.K.Naik Thigale ...

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE : 23.09.2024 P.C. :

1] The learned counsel for the respondent has placed on record affidavit of respondent - sole wherein he has consented to transfer the Petition No.A-617 of 2014 from the Family Court at Pune to the Family Court at Ahmednagar.

2] In view of the affidavit filed by the respondent - sole, the Misc. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause-B.

3] However, the Family Court at Ahmednagar is directed to permit the respondent - husband to appear

133.24MCA through Video Conferencing wherever it is possible so as to avoid inconvenience to the respondent-husband, so also, the Family Court at Ahmednagar to decide the proceedings expeditiously.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE DDC