Vijaysingh Manikrao Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

924delay.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD ...

924 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7767 OF 2012 IN FAST/14720/2012 WITH CA/7766/2012 IN FAST/14725/2012 WITH CA/7769/2012 IN FAST/14727/2012 WITH CA/7770/2012 IN FAST/14723/2012 VIJAYSINGH MANIKRAO PATIL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Gaikwad Hiraji T. AGP for Respondents 1 and 2: Mr. S M. Morampalle Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. S. G. Kolewar ...

CORAM

: S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.

DATE :

9th October, 2015 PER COURT :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the respective parties.

2.

There is delay in filing of appeal against the judgment and award passed by the reference court. Reasons stated in the application are not controverted by the respondents by filing any affidavit. The learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicants would not claim statutory benefits for the delayed period.

3.

For the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned. Civil application disposed of. ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ) JPC 1/1