Madhav Vishwanath Bande v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR
2025:BHC-AUG:3841
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14387 OF 2018 IN FAST/16446/2018 Dattatray Vithal Pingale
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ...
Mr. V. G. Sakolkar And Mr. H. B. Nandagawale, Advocate for Applicant Mr. D. J. Patil, AGP for Respondent-State Ms. S. M. Zaware, Advocate for Respondent No.2 ...
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14199 OF 2018 IN FAST/14433/2018 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14201 OF 2018 IN FAST/14441/2018 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14200 OF 2018 IN FAST/14445/2018 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14202 OF 2018 IN FAST/14450/2018 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 87 OF 2019 IN FAST/13941/2018 Dhondiram Nivrutti Mortale
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ...
Mr. V. G. Sakolkar And Mr. H. B. Nandagawale, Advocate for Applicant Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State Mr. S. C. Arora, Advocate for Respondent No.2
...
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 89 OF 2019 IN FAST/14164/2018 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 90 OF 2019 IN FAST/14169/2018 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 88 OF 2019 IN FAST/14173/2018 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 91 OF 2019 IN FAST/14177/2018 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 92 OF 2019 IN FAST/16448/2018 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7580 OF 2019 IN FAST/13953/2018 Kondabai Dasu Suryawanshi
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ...
Mr. V. G. Sakolkar And Mr. H. B. Nandagawale, Advocate for Applicant Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State Mr. S. A. Mulla h/f Mr. R. K. Ingole, Advocate for Respondent No.2 ...
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7582 OF 2019 IN FAST/14183/2018 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7581 OF 2019 IN FAST/14186/2018 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7584 OF 2019 IN FAST/14192/2018
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7583 OF 2019 IN FAST/14195/2018 .....
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
Dated : 10th FEBRUARY, 2025 PER COURT :- 1.
Heard rival submissions.
2.
The applicants in all these applications are seeking condonation of delay periods mentioned therein. The delay appears to be caused due to their poor financial condition. The learned counsel for the respondent Acquiring Body and the learned AGP strongly opposed the application on the ground that the delay is not properly explained.
3.
However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed and the respective delay periods mentioned in these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest and statutory benefits for the aforesaid periods of delay.
4.
The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.
5.
The applications are accordingly disposed of. ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) Rushikesh/2025