Vasishta Laxman Masure And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Others

907 CA 15670 OF 2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 907 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.15670 OF 2022 IN WPST/19939/2021 WITH CA/15674/2022 IN WPST/19956/2021 WITH CA/15691/2022 IN WPST/19955/2021 WITH CA/15692/2022 IN WPST/19934/2021 WITH CA/15699/2022 IN WPST/19959/2021 WITH CA/15686/2022 IN WPST/19943/2021 WITH CA/15684/2022 IN WPST/19958/2021 WITH CA/15685/2022 IN WPST/19945/2021 WITH CA/15683/2022 IN WPST/19940/2021 WITH CA/15687/2022 IN WPST/19928/2021 WITH CA/15689/2022 IN WPST/19963/2021 WITH CA/15688/2022 IN WPST/19936/2021 WITH CA/15675/2022 IN WPST/19957/2021 WITH CA/15676/2022 IN WPST/19964/2021 WITH CA/15673/2022 IN WPST/19946/2021 WITH CA/15671/2022 IN WPST/19937/2021 WITH CA/15682/2022 IN WPST/19954/2021 WITH CA/15680/2022 IN WPST/19951/2021 WITH CA/15681/2022 IN WPST/19962/2021 WITH CA/15679/2022 IN WPST/19931/2021 WITH CA/15678/2022 IN WPST/19947/2021 WITH CA/15677/2022 IN WPST/19949/2021 WITH CA/15672/2022 IN WPST/19960/2021 PRABHAKAR NIVRUTTI MUNDE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTH ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Rajendra G. Hange AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL & S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, JJ.

DATE : 08.02.2023 PER COURT :

Heard both the sides.

1/2

907 CA 15670 OF 2022.odt 2.

The respondent No. 4 is duly served but has not appeared. 3.

By way of these applications the applicants are seeking restoration of writ petitions dismissed for default for non removal of office objections with a prayer to condone the delay.

4.

For the reasons mentioned in the applications, coupled with the fact that the contents in the applications have not been controverted, the applications are allowed and the writ petitions are restored subject to the condition that the office objections would now be removed within two weeks.

( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) mkd/- 2/2