Purushottam Sakharam Patil And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2025:BHC-AUG:7335

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 939 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 749 OF 2024

1. PURUSHOTTAM SAKHARAM PATIL

2. DINESH SAMBHAJI PATIL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Girish S. Rane APP for Respondent/State: Mr. N. B. Patil ...

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE : 13.03.2025 P.C. :

1] Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned APP for the respondent-State.

2] The applicants are apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.0019/2024, registered at Marwad Police Station, District Jalgaon, for the offences punishable under Sections 326, 323, 143, 147, 148, 149, 294, 504, 506, 427 of the Indian Penal Code r/w. Sections 37(1)(c) and 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. 3] This court by order dated 15.05.2024 granted interim protection to the applicants. It is stated that thereafter the applicants have cooperated with the investigation and that the charge-sheet is filed in the matter and regular bail is also granted to the applicants.

4] In view of the above, the interim protection granted by order dated 15.05.2024 stands confirmed, on the following terms:

i] The applicants shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution in any manner. They shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case.

ii] The applicants shall co-operate in the proceedings before the trial Court.

5] In the event, the applicants violate any of the conditions specified in this order, it shall be liable to be cancelled.

6] It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present anticipatory bail application and the trial Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove.

7] The application stands disposed of.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE marathe