Parshuram Pandurang Anbhule v. Priti Paraji Anbhule Minor Th Her Guardian P T Anbhule And Others

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6671 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1455 OF 2018 Parshuram s/o Pandurang Anbhule, Age: 63 years, Occ: Pensioner, R/o. Ghumari, Tq. Karjat, District Ahmednagar.

..APPLICANT

VERSUS

Priti Paraji Anbhule, Age: Minor, Occ: Education, Through her guardian Paraji Tatyabhau Anbhule, Age: 35 years, Occ: Agri., R/o. Ghumari, Tq. Karjat, Dist. Ahmednagar & ors.

..RESPONDENTS Mr Ashwin V. Hon, Advocate for applicant;

Mr Nitin K. Choudhari, Advocate h/f Mr V.B.

Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioner in W.P.

Mr. Ashok Pavse, Advocate for respondent No.5 CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & S. M. GAVHANE,JJ.

DATE : 29th JUNE, 2018 ORAL ORDER :

Heard Mr. Ashwin Hon, learned Counsel appearing for the applicant.

(2) 2.

This is an application for seeking intervention in Writ Petition No. 1455 of 2018. In Writ Petition No. 1455 of 2018, the order passed by respondent No.2 Deputy Director of Education, Pune Division, Pune dated 11th October, 2017 is under challenge.

3.

Mr. Hon, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, by inviting our attention to the order impugned, submits that before respondent No.2, the applicant was also one of the party who was heard. The perusal of order passed by Deputy Director of Education shows that the applicant was before the Deputy Director of Education and in the order, it is stated that the applicant is representative of the trust/President and it is also further revealed that it was the applicant who raises some grievance as complainant before the authority.

4.

In the backdrop of above referred facts, it is submitted before us that the applicant be permitted to intervene in the petition, as he would

(3) be necessary party in the petition.

5.

Mr. Choudhari, learned Counsel holding for Mr. Deshmukh, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner though opposes the application, we find merit in the submission of Mr. Hon, learned Counsel for the applicant. Resultantly, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A) and disposed of accordingly.

(S. M. GAVHANE) (PRASANNA B. VARALE) JUDGE JUDGE Tupe