Anmolsing S/O Suvarnasingh Jabbal v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2024:BHC-AUG:9700-DB 47 CRWP 850 24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 47 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 850 OF 2024 ANMOLSING S/O SUVARNASINGH JABBAL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Rupesh Anil Jaiswal APP for Respondents/State : Mr. G.A. Kulkarni ...

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL & SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.

DATE : 06.05.2024 PER COURT :

Heard both the sides.

2.

The petitioner's application for regular parole has been turned down by the impugned order only by referring to Rule 19(3)(g)(ii) of the Maharashtra Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole Leave) (Amendment) Rules, 2022 on the ground that a period of one and half year since last return from parole or furlough leave is not over. 3.

Though in a different context, a full bench of this Court in Kantilal Nandlal Jaiswal Versus Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur ; (2019) 6 Mh.L.J. 186, has struck down a similar bar contained in a proviso, as violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India. 4.

This Court has been expressly directing that the request shall be considered ignoring the specific bar contained in similar provision of the statutory period being not over since previous return. 5.

We have been referred to a similar direction contained in the order passed in Criminal Writ Petition No.52/2024 (Shivaji Ganeshrao Jawale Vs. 1/2

47 CRWP 850 24.odt State of Maharashtra) dated 09.01.2024.

6.

Similarly the learned APP also submits that independently all these similar clauses putting a bar for consideration of the request for leave by the prisons, are being reconsidered by the State pursuant to the observations of the full bench.

7.

The writ petition is partly allowed. The impugned order is quashed and set aside.

8.

The respondent No.4 shall pass a fresh order within a period of two (02) weeks on the petitioner's application for parole on its own merits, but shall not reject it only on the ground that a period of one and half year has not lapsed, after the last return from the leave. ( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) mkd/- 2/2