← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/283/2015disposed offdismissed for default

Kalawati Prabhakar Gaikwad v. State Of Maharashtra And Others

2015-08-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav3 pages

1 CP283.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH

AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 283 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9802 OF 2012 Kalawati Prabhakar Gaikwad .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Others .. Respondents WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 284 OF 2015 Muktabai Vishwanath Nawale .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Others .. Respondents WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 286 OF 2015 Laxman Gahninath Pawar .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Others .. Respondents WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 287 OF 2015 Shaikh Kachru Shaikh Masud .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Others .. Respondents WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 289 OF 2015 Vithal Annaji Mahadik .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Others .. Respondents

2 CP283.15 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 291 OF 2015 Kalyan Dagdu Duche .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Others .. Respondents WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 292 OF 2015 Mitulal Kupchand Pokharna .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Others .. Respondents WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 293 OF 2015 Nivrutti Maruti Dhobale .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Others .. Respondents WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 294 OF 2015 Tryambak Sonajirao Patil .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Others .. Respondents WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 295 OF 2015 Datatraya Sonaji Nawale .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Others .. Respondents Shri Mahesh R. Sonawane, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri K. J. Ghute Patil, A. G. P. for Respondent / State. Shri P. P. More, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5.

3 CP283.15 CORAM :

S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND V. K. JADHAV, JJ.

DATE :

13 AUGUST, 2015.

PER COURT :

1.

These contempt petitions are filed on the ground that, orders passed by this Court on 13 th February, 2014 are not complied.

2.

Mr. More, the learned counsel for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 submits that, at their end they have forwarded the proposal to the Government for sanctioning and releasing the arrears of salary as per the pay scale as detailed in the order dated 22 nd December, 2014 itself.

The Zilla Parishad has forwarded the proposal in respect of these petitioners to the Government i.e. the School Education and Sports Department on 04 th April, 2014. Communication was received to give the details about the monetary burden for releasing the payment as per the said pay scale. The Zilla Parishad has also forwarded the same to the Government and it is for the Government to take decision. The Government shall decide the proposal (Page.34) expeditiously and preferably within four (4) months. On the decision being taken by the Government, Zilla Parishad shall within one month thereafter release the payment to the petitioner. The Zilla Parishad upon receiving sanction shall release the amount to petitioners. The contempt petitions as such stand disposed of.

[ V. K. JADHAV, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] sam/Aug. 15