Savita Bhaskar Walekar And ORS v. Sumit Shantilal Bafna And ANR

(1) 976 CA-7476.2019.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 976 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7476 OF 2019 IN FAST/14147/2019 SAVITA BHASKAR WALEKAR AND OTHERS

VERSUS

SUMIT SHANTILAL BAFNA AND ANOTHER ...

Mr. M.M. Bhokarikar, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. R.D. Borde, Advocate holding for Mr. Uday Malte, Advocate for respondent No.2.

...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

16.11.2022.

ORDER :

1.

Heard the rival submissions. The applicants are seeking condonation of delay of 153 days in fling the appeal. According to them, the delay has been caused due to fnancial crisis. Though the learned Counsel for the respondent strongly opposed the applications, but considering the statutory right of the applicants, the aforesaid period of delay stands condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the said delay period. 2.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of offce objection.

3.

The application stands disposed of accordingly. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde