The State Of Maharashtra And Another v. Trivenibai Shivaji Patil And Another

2025:BHC-AUG:30381 ca9563.13 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 920 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9563 OF 2013 IN FAST/14867/2013 The State of Maharashtra And Another

VERSUS

Trivenibai Shivaji Patil And Another ...

A.G.P. for Applicant : Mr. D.J. Patil Advocate for Respondents : Mr. C.V. Borse h/f Mr. Vijay B. Patil .....

CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.

DATED : 6th NOVEMBER 2025 PER COURT :- 1.

This is an application for condonation of delay of 1732 days caused in filing the first appeal.

2.

Perused the application and heard learned A.G.P. for the applicant-State. Learned advocate for the respondents strongly opposed the application. Learned A.G.P. for the applicant-State pointed out the grounds stated in the application that the proposal for filing appeal was sent. Thereafter, there was official communication for preferring the appeal. He further pointed out that the delay is not caused deliberately and due to administrative difficulty the delay is caused. Therefore, the appeal was not preferred within limitation. 3.

In view of the above and considering the reasons stated in

ca9563.13 -2the application, it would be proper to condone the delay caused in filing the appeal, as the delay is not deliberate. The application, therefore, is allowed in the interest of justice. The delay is condoned. 4.

In first appeal, issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 18.12.2025.

5.

Learned advocate for the respondents - claimants waives notice for the respondents in the respective matters. (SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) rlj/