← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/392/2019delay condonatedrejected

Gurunath Raghunath Jadhav And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

2022-09-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Dige2 pages

{1} 958-CA-396-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 396 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 14477 OF 2018 WITH CA/391/2019 IN FAST/14496/2018 WITH CA/392/2019 IN FAST/14481/2018 WITH CA/393/2019 IN FAST/14485/2018 WITH CA/394/2019 IN FAST/14483/2018 WITH CA/395/2019 IN FAST/14479/2018 WITH CA/397/2019 IN FAST/14490/2018 WITH CA/398/2019 IN FAST/14488/2018 WITH CA/400/2019 IN FAST/14492/2018 WITH CA/399/2019 IN FAST/14494/2018 DILIP RAMRAO KSHIRSAGAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. J.V. Patil h/f. Mr. G.A. Gadhe AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 3 : Mr. P.M. Kulkarni Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Ms. Chaitali Choudhari-Kutti ....

CORAM : S.G. DIGE, J.

DATE : 29th September, 2022 ORDER :

.

Heard learned Counsel for applicant, learned A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 3 and learned Counsel for respondent No.2.

2.

Considering the submissions of all the learned Counsel and reasons mentioned in the applications, applications are Pooja K.

{2} 958-CA-396-2019 allowed. The delay of 2854 days for fling appeals is condoned.

3.

The applicant shall not claim any interest and statutory benefts for the delayed period and shall fle undertaking in that regard.

4.

Appeals be registered subject to removal of ofce objections, if any.

5.

The Civil applications are disposed of.

[S.G. DIGE, J.] Pooja K.