Angad Namdeo Oname v. The State Of Maharashtra

ba668.21.odt - 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO. 668 OF 2021 Angad S/o Namdeo Oname Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr. T.M. Venjane, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S.D. Ghayal, APP for respondent/State.

CORAM : M.G. SEWLIKAR, J.

DATE : 21st October, 2021.

PER COURT :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant for some time. When this Court expressed its disinclination to grant any relief to the applicant, learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, sought permission to withdraw the application. He further submits that because of failing health of the applicant, applicant be permitted to make application before the Trial Court if the trial does not get concluded within a period of one year.

2.

Applicant is permitted to apply for bail before the Trial Court if trial does not get concluded within a period of one year. 3.

Application stands disposed of as withdrawn.

( M. G. SEWLIKAR ) Judge dyb

ba668.21.odt - 2 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1900 OF 2021 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO. 668 OF 2021 Sanjay Dayanand Sude Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & another Respondents Ms. M.S. Mhase, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. S.D. Ghayal, APP for respondent/State.

Mr. T.M. Venjane, Advocate for respondent No. 2. CORAM : M.G. SEWLIKAR, J.

DATE : 21st October, 2021.

PER COURT :

Application is allowed and accordingly disposed of. ( M. G. SEWLIKAR ) Judge dyb