← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/9391/2022delay condonatedrejected

Dnyaneshwar S/O Baburao Tupe And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr The Collector, Aurangabad And ORS

2022-10-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Dige1 pages

(1) 948-ca-9391-2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9391 OF 2022 IN FAST/13900/2022 DNYANESHWAR S/O BABURAO TUPE AND ANR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR, AURANGABAD AND ORS ...

Mr. Tejas C. Sonawane and Mr. D. A. Bide, Advocates for the Applicants.

Mr. S. N. Morampalle, AGP for Respondents-State. Mr. S. S. Dande, Advocate for Respondent No.3. ...

CORAM : S. G. DIGE, J.

DATED : 11th OCTOBER, 2022.

PER COURT:- 1.

Heard learned Counsel for applicants and learned Counsel for respondents.

2.

Considering the submissions of all learned Counsel and reasons mentioned in the application, the application is allowed. The delay of 2523 days for filing appeal is condoned.

3.

The applicants shall not claim any interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period and shall file undertaking in that regard. 4.

Appeal be registered subject to removal of office objections, if any.

5.

Civil application is disposed of.

(S. G. DIGE) JUDGE Devendra/October-2022