← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/1021/2022delay condonatedrejected

The G.M.I.D.C., Thr The Ex. Engineer, Minor Irrigation Div. Parbhani And ORS v. Mahadu Sambhaji Kejgir

2022-04-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni3 pages

1 ca 1017.2022+

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 911 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1017 OF 2022 IN FAST/14696/2021 THE GODAVARI MARATHWADA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, THROUGH THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, PARBHANI AND OTHERS

VERSUS

MAHAHUKAR SAMBHAJI KEJGIR ...

Advocate for Applicants:

Mr. S. R. Kedar h/f. Mr. Ranjit B. Gaikwad Advocate for Respondent: Mr. Mahesh Kale ...

WITH ...

911 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1019 OF 2022 IN FAST/14486/2021 THE GODAVARI MARATHWADA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, THROUGH THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, PARBHANI AND OTHERS

VERSUS

BALU @ BALASAHEB SAMBAJI KESGIR ...

Advocate for Applicants:

Mr. S. R. Kedar h/f. Mr. Ranjit B. Gaikwad Advocate for Respondent: Mr. Mahesh Kale ...

WITH ...

911 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1021 OF 2022 IN FAST/14699/2021 THE GODAVARI MARATHWADA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, THROUGH THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR

2 ca 1017.2022+ IRRIGATION DIVISION, PARBHANI AND OTHERS

VERSUS

MAHADU SAMBHAJI KEJGIR ...

Advocate for Applicants:

Mr. S. R. Kedar h/f. Mr. Ranjit B. Gaikwad Advocate for Respondent: Mr. Mahesh Kale ...

CORAM:SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.

DATE: 08th APRIL, 2022 PER COURT:

1.

These are the applications for condonation of delay moved by the applicant / acquiring body. 2.

Heard Mr. S. R. Kedar holding for Mr. R. B.

Gaikwad, learned Counsel for the applicant / acquiring body.

3.

Issue notice to Respondents. Mr. Mahesh Kale, learned Counsel on instructions submits that he has instructions to appear on behalf Respondents / claimants and waives notice.

4.

He submitted that he has no objection to condone the delay in all the applications for condonation of delay.

3 ca 1017.2022+

ORDER

[I] The applications for condonation of delay moved by the applicant / acquiring body are hereby allowed in terms of prayer clause "4(A)".

[II] The Registry is directed to make scrutiny of the appeals as per procedure and thereafter it be numbered and placed before the Court for admission.

5.

Civil Applications are accordingly disposed of.

[SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.] marathe