Gahininath Matsya Vyavsaik S0ahakari Sanstha Ltd Thr Its Chairman Arunlal Dagadu Limbore v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1063 WRIT PETITION NO.6643 OF 2021 KALIKADEVI MATSYA VYAVSAY AHAKARI SANSTHA LTD DAHIWANDI THR ITS CHAIRMAN RAJU GOPICHAND KACHARE ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER..RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.6644 OF 2021 MACHINDRANATH MATSYA VYAVSAY AHAKARI SANSTHA LTD THR ITS SECRETARY DIGAMBAR DAGADU BALE ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER..RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.6645 OF 2021 MANGESH MATSYA VYAVSAY AHAKARI SANSTHA LTD THR ITS CHAIRMAN MANGESH RAMCHANDRA HANDIBAG ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER..RESPONDENTS AND WRIT PETITION NO.6646 OF 2021 PRERNA MAGASVARGIYA MATSYA VYAVSAY AHAKARI SANSTHA LTD THR ITS SECRETARY ASHOK RAJENDRA GAIKWAD ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER..RESPONDENTS
(2) AND WRIT PETITION NO.6647 OF 2021 GAHININATH MATSYA VYAVSAY AHAKARI SANSTHA LTD THR ITS CHAIRMAN ARUNLAL DAGADU LIMBORE ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER..RESPONDENTS ...
Mr. Deshmukh, Advocate h/f Mr. Kamlakar J.
Suryawanshi, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGP for Respondents-State. Mr. P. D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
...
AND 1066 WRIT PETITION NO.6720 OF 2021 NANDABAI SHIVAJI KUNDE ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS ...
Mr. Deshmukh, Advocate h/f Mr. Kamlakar J.
Suryawanshi, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. S. G. Karlekar, AGP for Respondents-State. Mr. L. H. Kawale, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 3.
...
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & R. N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATED : 16th JULY, 2021.
PER COURT:- 1.
Mr. P. D. Suryawanshi, learned counsel for Zilla Parishad submits that the Hon'ble Minister has stayed the tender process undertaken by the Zilla Parishad. The report is directed to be given.
(3) 2.
We have heard Mr. K. J. Suryawanshi, learned counsel for petitioners also.
3.
In light of the fact that, the Hon'ble Minister has taken cognizance of the tender process and has granted stay to it, it would be improper to entertain the petitions.
4.
As stay to the tender process is already granted, the petitioners, if they so choose, may approach the Hon'ble Minister with their grievance. 5.
In case, order are passed by the Hon'ble Minister adverse to the interest of petitioners, petitioners may agitate afresh about their rights. 6.
In that event, all contentions of parties are kept open.
7.
Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs.
(R. N. LADDHA) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE Devendra/July-2021