Manik Tukaram Bankar v. Dr. Shri Vijay Pandharipande And Another

cp646-15.doc drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.646 OF 2015 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 106 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2655 OF 2009 Manik Tukaram Bankar PETITIONER

VERSUS

Dr. Vijay Pandharipande and Another RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. A. M. Gholap, Advocate for the Petitioner Mrs. Uma S. Bhosale, AGP for Respondent - State .......

[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, & SMT. VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. J.] DATE : 15 th SEPTEMBER, 2025 ORDER :

1.

Learned Advocate for the Petitioner states that his client has taken away the papers and instructed him to withdraw the Contempt Petition, as the lady colleague, against whom he was prosecuting the proceedings, stood retired. He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the Contempt Petition. 2.

Permission granted.

3.

Contempt Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. [ SMT. VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE JUDGE drp/cp646-15.doc