Ramesh Jeevram Khadke And ORS v. The State Of Mah And ORS

{1} 914 sr.no..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4682 OF 2011 RAMESH JEEVRAM KHADKE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Dhananjay B. Thoke. AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : Mr. S.G. Karlekar. Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. Sandeep Swami, Advocate h/f Mr. V.D. Gunale.

Advocate for Respondent No.6 : Mr. K.C. Sant. CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & A.M. BADAR, JJ.

DATE : 7TH JANUARY, 2016.

PER COURT:

1] Mr. Thoke, learned counsel submits that the impugned resolution has not been acted upon and it was itself stayed. In the light of that, the purpose of the writ petition is otherwise served. In case further steps are taken, petitioner would be at liberty to assail the same in accordance with law.

2] Writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

[A.M. BADAR] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA] JUDGE JUDGE grt/-