Pvr Talkies Treasure Bazaar Mall Latur Through Its Manager Rohit Suresh Mhankale v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

{1} wp471018.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4710 OF 2018 PVR Talkies Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.P.D.Bachate, advocate holding for Mr.N.N.Desale, advocate for petitioner.

Mr.S.M.Ganachari, A.G.P. for Respondents.

CORAM : R.M.BORDE & A.M.DHAVALE, JJ.

DATE : 21st June, 2018 PER COURT:

Learned A.G.P., appearing for the State, on instructions, states that the Review Application tendered by the petitioner under Section 10-A(3) of the Maharashtra Entertainment Duty Act, 1923, would be decided, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from today. It is further stated that the application seeking stay to the impugned order presented before the Revisional Authority would be decided within a period of four weeks from today. It is also stated that until the decision on the stay application by the State Government and subject thereto, no coercive action would be taken against the petitioner.

Statement made by the learned A.G.P. is accepted. Until decision on the interim application presented by the petitioner seeking stay to the effect and operation of the adverse

{2} wp471018.odt order and subject thereto, no coercive action be taken against the petitioner.

In view of above direction, writ petition stands disposed of.

A.M.DHAVLE R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE adb/