← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/7153/2023disposed off

Bharatiy Suraksha Rakshak And General Kamgar Union Through Its President v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Another

2025-03-20Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:8483-DB wp7153.23 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 944 WRIT PETITION NO. 7153 OF 2023 Bharatiy Suraksha Rakshak and General Kamgar Union Through Its President

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and another ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Aghav Avinash D AGP for Respondent No.1: Mrs. Rashmi P. Gour Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Rakesh N. Jain h/f Mr. Yatin Thole .....

CORAM

: ALOK ARADHE, C.J. & S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.

DATE : 20th MARCH, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

The petitioner Union espouses the cause of the candidates, who have applied for registration under Ahmednagar Security Guards Board. The petitioner has annexed the chart at Exhibit A indicating the dates on which, the security guards were registered online alongwith their profile ID. 2.

In identical set of circumstances, this Court at the Principal Seat, had passed an order on 20.9.2022 in writ petition No. 4725 of 2018 (Pradeep Shankar Patil and others vs Security Guards Board for Greater Mumbai and Thane District and others). 3.

The learned counsel for the respective sides are

wp7153.23 -2united in submitting that the order in Pradeep Shankar Patil (supra), which was followed in Writ Petition No.948 of 2022 filed by Bhartiya Suraksha Rakshak vs. State of Maharashtra and others, may be passed in this matter.

4.

In view of the above, this Writ Petition is disposed off with the following directions:- a) Respondent No.2 Board shall consider the applications tendered by the petitioner on their own merits and in accordance with law in the light of the directions contained in the order dated 8.2.2017, passed in Writ Petition No.2939 of 2016 (Pune District Suraksha Rakshak and General Kamgar Union vs. The State of Maharashtra and others), as expeditiously as possible and without any further delay.

b) All contentions of the parties are kept open. (S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE) rlj/