Jijaram Shrikrushna Bagal v. The State Of Mah And ORS

2025:BHC-AUG:186-DB 1 wp 5832.12

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5832 OF 2012 Jijaram Shrikrushna Bagal .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Majit S. Shaikh, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. B. Pulkundwar, A.G.P. for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Shri S. S. Thombre, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4. Shri V. V. Bhavthankar, Advocate for the Respondent No. 6. WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 266 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5832 OF 2012 Jijaram Shrikrushna Bagal .. Petitioner

Versus

Dr. P. R. Gaikwad and another .. Respondents Shri Majit S. Shaikh, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. B. Pulkundwar, A.G.P. for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. WITH REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 203 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5832 OF 2012 The State of Maharashtra and others .. Applicants

Versus

Jijaram Shrikrushna Bagal and others .. Respondents

2 wp 5832.12 Shri S. B. Pulkundwar, A.G.P. for the Applicants Shri Majit S. Shaikh, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1 Shri S. S. Thombre, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. Shri V. V. Bhavthankar, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4. CORAM : S. G. MEHARE AND SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.

DATE : 03RD JANUARY, 2025.

ORDER :

.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed on record written instructions of the petitioner that he does not want to proceed with the writ petition and contempt petition. 2.

In view of written instructions, writ petition and contempt petition stand dismissed as withdrawn.

3.

In view of withdrawal of writ petition and contempt petition, nothing survives in the review application. The review application stands disposed of.

[SHAILESH P. BRAHME J.] [S. G. MEHARE, J.] bsb/Jan. 25