Rajendra Bhaskar Kadam v. The Tahasildar Akole And Others

1 wp 5102.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5102 OF 2016 Rajendra Bhaskar Kadam .. Petitioner

Versus

The Tahsildar Akole and others .. Respondents Shri Shivraj V. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri A. V. Deshmukh, A. G. P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND K. K. SONAWANE, JJ.

DATE : 05TH MAY, 2016.

PER COURT :

.

The petitioner claims that road is being sought to be constructed from his field. There are private parties also in the matter.

2.

The question of ownership, extent of ownership everything would be involved in the present writ petition. It would not be possible to consider the same in the writ jurisdiction. The petitioner may avail the alternate remedy.

3.

For a period of five (05) days from today, the parties shall maintain status quo as on today, so as to enable the petitioner to avail alternate remedy. In that regard all contentions are kept

2 wp 5102.16 open. Needless to state on lapse of five (05) days, the interim protection granted shall come to an end. The writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

[ K. K. SONAWANE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/May 16