← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/12215/2022delay condonatedrejected

Rooplal Sadashiv Shrivastav v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Dist. Collector, Nanded And Others

2023-02-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 916 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11540 OF 2022 IN FAST/14496/2022 FATRUSAB ISMAILSAB (DIED) THR LRS. GORIBI FATRUSAB AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NANDED AND OTHERS ...

918 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12209 OF 2022 IN FAST/14176/2022 SK. KAREEM SK. HYDER (DIED) THR LRS. SK. RASOOL SK. KAREEM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NANDED AND OTHERS ...

919 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12210 OF 2022 IN FAST/14183/2022 SHANKARAPPA TANAAPPA NUCHE (DIED) THR LRS.

VAIJANATHAPPA SHANKARAPPA NUCHE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DIST. COLLECTOR, NANDED AND OTHERS ...

920 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12211 OF 2022 IN FAST/14200/2022 KISHANLAL RAMRAJ SHRIVASTAV (DIED) THR LRS GODAVARI AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NANDED AND OTHERS ...

921 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12213 OF 2022 IN FAST/14143/2022 SK. BASHEER ABDUL KAREEM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR,

NANDED AND OTHERS ...

AND 922 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12215 OF 2022 IN FAST/14166/2022 ROOPLAL SADASHIV SHRIVASTAV

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DIST. COLLECTOR, NANDED AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Kakde Shubham Madhavrao AGP for Respondent/s - State : Mr. B.

V.

Virdhe, Mr. S. N. Kendre, Mr. S.

W. Munde Mr. A. B. Chate respectively.

Advocate for Respondent No. 3 : Mr. S. B. Patil ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 15.02.2023 PER COURT :

Heard rival submissions. The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay periods as mentioned therein, in all these matters, which appear to be caused due to their poor financial condition. The learned AGP as well as learned counsel for the Acquiring Body strongly opposed the applications on the ground that there is huge delay.

2.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants, the delay periods, in all these applications, stand condoned subject to

condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid periods of delay.

3.

Appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

4.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE .....

shp/-