← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/5647/2024admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Narsing Arjun Kawale (Died) Thr His Lrs Rukmaji (Died) Thr Lrs Tulsabai And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector, Latur And ANR

2024-06-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. G. Avachat,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote3 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:12377-DB :: 1 ::

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5647 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.408 OF 2018 Narshing s/o Arjun Kawale, Died L.Rs.

Rukmaji s/o Narshing Kawale, Died L.Rs.

Tulsabai w/o Rukmaji Kawale & ors.

... APPLICANTS

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & anr.

... RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. G.K. Sontakke, Advocate for applicants Mr. G.A. Kulkarni, A.G.P. for State Mr. B.R. Surwase, Advocate for respondent No.2. .......

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5650 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.407 OF 2018 Ramesh Ramrao Kawale ... APPLICANT

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & anr.

... RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. G.K. Sontakke, Advocate for applicant Mr. G.A. Kulkarni, A.G.P. for State Mr. B.R. Surwase, Advocate for respondent No.2. .......

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5648 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.406 OF 2018

:: 2 ::

Deorao Maruti Rathod ... APPLICANT

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & anr.

... RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. G.K. Sontakke, Advocate for applicant Mr. G.A. Kulkarni, A.G.P. for State Mr. B.R. Surwase, Advocate for respondent No.2. .......

CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT AND NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.

DATE : 28th JUNE, 2024 O R D E R :

These are the applications filed by the claimants to release the Bank guarantee furnished by them before this Court during the pendency of the appeals.

2.

Learned Advocates for the applicants and acquiring body are present. Learned A.G.P. for State is also present. Learned Advocate for acquiring body and claimants submit that the appeals have been settled before the National Lok Adamat dated 3/3/2024 and the settlement terms have also been passed and the appeals have accordingly been disposed of. They submit that, in view of this, the applications be allowed.

:: 3 ::

3.

In view of the above submissions which are supported by the averments in the applications, the civil applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) (NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.) (R.G. AVACHAT, J.) fmp/-