Ranjana Bhagwanrao Suryawanshi v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 70 WRIT PETITION NO.4963 OF 2018 RANJANA BHAGWANRAO SURYAWANSHI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Dhage Vaibhav B. AGP for Respondent State: Mr. S. M. Ganachari Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Shinde Ashish B

CORAM

: S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.

DATE :

29th January, 2019 PER COURT :

1.

Lenard learned counsel appearing for parties. 2.

There is innocuous prayer inasmuch as the petitioner has sought directions to respondents to decide the representations filed by the petitioner requesting for transfer at one place under the scheme known as "Couple Convenience Scheme".

3.

In the light of above, we direct respondents to decide the representation filed by the petitioner, keeping in view the policy of Government i.e "Couple Convenience Scheme" and after following procedural formalities, on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible, however, within a period of four weeks from today.

4.

With the above observations, writ petition stands disposed of. 5.

Parties to act upon authenticated copy of this order. (A. M. DHAVALE, J.) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ) JPC