Datta Maroti Dhanve v. The State Of Maharashtra

( 1 ) wp4957.18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4957 OF 2018 DATTA MAROTI DHANVE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Mr.Hemant Pawar h/f. Mr.V.P. Raje, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.S.K. Tambe, AGP for respondent/State.

CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA & S.M.GAVHANE, JJ.

DATED :

21.08.2018 P.C. :- 1.

We have heard Mr. Pawar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned AGP. Original Application has been dismissed on the ground that the petitioner has alternate remedy available. The petitioner is suspended in the month of October, 2017. The petitioner has remedy under Rule 17 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline & Appeal) Rules.

2.

In view of that, it cannot be said that the order of the Tribunal is erroneous. The petitioner may avail alternate remedy as observed by the Tribunal. If such proceeding is filed, the Authority shall decide the same expeditiously, preferably within three months from the receipt of the application.

( 2 ) wp4957.18 3.

The writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

[S.M.GAVHANE,J.] [S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.] /2018/ 18/ snk AUG wp4957.18