Vilas Vinayak Mule v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

ba-814.24 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 931 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 814 OF 2024 VILAS VINAYAK MULE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Mr. D.R. Kale Advocate h/f. Mr. Dinesh D. Nikam Advocate for Applicant.

Ms. S.S. Joshi, A.P.P. for Resp. No.1.

Ms. Bharti Gunjal Advocate for Resp. No.2, appointed through Legal Aid.

...

CORAM: S.G. MEHARE, J.

DATE : 25th JUNE, 2024 ORDER :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the complainant and also gone through the papers. After hearing the respective counsels at length, the Court expressed disinclination to grant bail. 2.

Learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application.

3.

Leave granted. The application stands dismissed as withdrawn.

ba-814.24 4.

The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Aurangabad do pay the legal fees to Advocate Ms. Bharti Gunjal, as per the schedule, who was appointed through Legal Aid to represent the complainant.

[ S.G. MEHARE, J. ] asb/JUNE24