Nana Rakhmaji Kapse (Died) Thr Lrs Gangadhar And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 958 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4887 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 15098 OF 2019 RUSTUM YADAV GAIKWAD AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND 959 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4888 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 14715 OF 2019 PUNDLIK SHAMRAO KAPSE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER AND 960 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4889 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 14712 OF 2019 NANA RAKHMAJI KAPSE (DIED) THR LRS GANGADHAR AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER AND 961 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4891 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 14677 OF 2019 PUNDLIK SHAMRAO KAPSE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND 962 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4892 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 15302 OF 2019 1/3
RAMRAO REVJI JADHAV (DIED) LRS SHANTABAI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND 965 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4905 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 15090 OF 2019 UTTAM YADAV GAIKWAD (DIED) THR LRS ASARABAI AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER K.K.V.M. AURANGABAD AND OTHERS ...
Mr. B.K. Pawar h/f. Mr. A.M. Hajare - Advocate for Applicants Mr. S.N. Kendre, Mr. B.V. Virdhe and Mr. S.P. Tiwari - AGP's for Respondents, State ....
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
DATE : 11th July, 2023 PER COURT :
1.
Heard rival submissions.
2.
The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay periods mentioned in these applications, which appear to be caused due to their poor financial condition. 3.
The learned A.G.P. strongly opposed the application on the ground that, no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay periods and there is also circulation 2/3
delay.
4.
However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed and the delay periods mentioned in these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the period of aforesaid delay and also for delay in circulating the matters belatedly.
5.
The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.
6.
The applications are accordingly disposed of. [ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] JUDGE 3/3