Haresh Hasmukh Rambhiya, v. Afjal Husenkhan Pathan And Another

2025:BHC-AUG:24853 2-APPLN-1578-25.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1578 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (ST) NO. 4492 OF 2025 WITH APPLN/1579/2025 IN REVNST/4490/2025 WITH APPLN/1580/2025 IN REVNST/4482/2025 WITH APPLN/1581/2025 IN REVNST/4488/2025 WITH APPLN/1582/2025 IN REVNST/4479/2025 WITH APPLN/1583/2025 IN REVNST/4476/2025 WITH APPLN/1584/2025 IN REVNST/4474/2025 WITH APPLN/1585/2025 IN REVNST/4471/2025 WITH APPLN/1586/2025 IN REVNST/4469/2025 WITH APPLN/1587/2025 IN REVNST/4466/2025 WITH APPLN/1589/2025 IN REVNST/4464/2025 WITH APPLN/1590/2025 IN REVNST/4460/2025 Haresh Hasmukh Rambhiya ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

Afkal Husenkhan Pathan and Another ..RESPONDENTS ....

Mr. A.C. Darandale, Advocate for respondent no.1 Mr. R.K. Ingole, Ms. V.S. Chaudhari and Ms. A.S. Deshmukh, A.G.Ps. For respondent no.1 - State in respective matters ....

CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.

DATE : 15th SEPTEMBER, 2025 PER COURT :

.

None for the applicant. In all applications, the applicant is the same.

2.

The applicant has filed these applications to condone the delay of 52 days in filing the revision applications, for which learned A.G.P. and learned counsel for respondent no.1 have objected. 3.

Having considered the reasons disclosed in the applications as well 1 / 2

2-APPLN-1578-25.odt as the fact that the applicant wants to challenge the order of the learned Sessions Court, and, if an opportunity is not granted to the applicant, then he will be deprived of his statutory right to file an appeal. On the other hand, if the delay is condoned, it would not cause prejudice to the respondents. 4.

As such, all applications are allowed. The delay caused in filing the appeal is condoned. Revision applications are to be registered accordingly. ( ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. ) SSD 2 / 2