Chainsing Bhagvansing Thoke And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 wp 5148.18+

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5148 OF 2018 NAYANA BHILA PATIL AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Mr. D. B. Thoke, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. S. B. Yawalkar, A.G.P. for Respondents No. 1 and 2.

Mr. M. S. Sonawane, Advocate for Respondents No. 3 to 5.

Mr. C. K. Shinde, Advocate for Respondent No. 7. Mr. V. P. Patil, Advocate for Respondent No. 10. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5153 OF 2018 CHAINSING BHAGAVANSING THOKE AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Mr. D. B. Thoke, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. S. B. Yawalkar, A.G.P. for Respondents No. 1 and 2.

Mr. M. S. Sonawane, Advocate for Respondents No. 3 to 5.

CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.

DATE:

th MARCH, 2019

2 wp 5148.18+ PER COURT :

1.

Mr. Thoke, learned Advocate for the petitioners, on instructions, submits that the petitioners had sought transfer on the ground of couple convenience and they have been transferred within the periphery of 30 Kms. and their grievance stand redressed.

2.

In view of that, nothing remains for adjudication.

3.

Writ Petitions stand disposed of. No costs.

[A. M. DHAVALE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] marathe