The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Abad v. Mirza Quaisar Baig

(1) ITA-63.2010 & ors.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 901 TAX APPEAL NO.63 OF 2010 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II

VERSUS

SADHANA UMAKANT DHAKE AND 902 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.15 OF 2012 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ABAD

VERSUS

MIRZA QUAISAR BAIG AND 903 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.27 OF 2014 WITH ITA/28/2014 WITH ITA/29/2014 IN ITA/28/2014 WITH ITA/30/2014 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), NAGPUR

VERSUS

M/S MULAY CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD.

AND 904 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.100 OF 2016 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, AURANGABAD

VERSUS

M/S PEOPLES CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.

AND 905 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.68 OF 2018 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 NASHIK

VERSUS

AADHUNIK INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PVT LTD., JALGAON AND 906 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.73 OF 2018 THR PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 NASHIK

VERSUS

CHARUSHILA SURESH BOROLE AND

(2) ITA-63.2010 & ors.odt 907 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2 OF 2019 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 AURANGABAD

VERSUS

M/S ABHAY CONTEX PVT LTD., JALNA AND 908 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3 OF 2020 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 1 AURANGABAD

VERSUS

M/S. PARESH FARMS PVT LTD., AURANGABAD ...

Mr. Alok Sharma, senior panel advocate for appellant. ...

CORAM :

SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.

DATE :

11th March 2021.

PER COURT :- 1.

Matters are appearing on board for correction of date since the date of letter instructing learned advocate to withdraw the matters is printed as "01-02-2021", which in fact is "09-02-2021".

2.

As such, the date appearing in order dated 17th February 2021 be corrected as "09-02-2021" in place of "01-02-2021". Correction be carried out and the corrected date should be deemed to be part of the order dated 17th February 2021.

3.

Rest of the order dated 17th February 2021 remains the same.

(ABHAY AHUJA, J.) (SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.) VD_Dhirde