← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6194/2017disposed offdismissed for default

Nagnath Balwant Bondle v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2018-02-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun M. Dhavale7 pages

1 wp 6194.17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6194 OF 2017 Nagnath Balwant Bondle .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and other .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6175 OF 2017 Chandrakala Nagnath Govindwad .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and other .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6176 OF 2017 Smita Shankarrao Thakke .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and other .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6177 OF 2017 Mohan Ramchandra Alamwad .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and other .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6178 OF 2017 Sachin Achutrao Siddhewad .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and other .. Respondents

2 wp 6194.17 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6179 OF 2017 Vithal Balu Bogulwar .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and other .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6180 OF 2017 Ganesh Mahajan Pallewad .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and other .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6183 OF 2017 Suresh Narayan Gurjalwad .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and other .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6187 OF 2017 Shivajirao Madhavrao Yemalwad .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and other .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6188 OF 2017 Saiprakash Rajendra Maddi .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and other .. Respondents WITH

3 wp 6194.17 WRIT PETITION NO. 6190 OF 2017 Anjanabai Ramchandra Alamwad .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and other .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6191 OF 2017 Asha Venkatrao Potalwad .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and other .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6192 OF 2017 Sangita Sahebrao Singarwad .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and other .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6205 OF 2017 Shamrao Sayanna Ramod .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and other .. Respondents Shri Sunil M. Vibhute, Advocate for the Petitioner in all matters. Mrs. A. V. Gondhalekar, Addl.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in all matters.

Shri Sachin G. Joshi, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4 in W.P. No. 6194 of 2017.

Shri P. R. Tandale, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 to 7 in W. P. No. 6175 of 2017.

Shri Avinash R. Salve, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4 in W. P. No. 6176 of 2017 and W. P. No. 6180 of 2017 Shri T. S. Lodhe, Advocate h/f Mrs. Yogita M. Kshirsagar,

4 wp 6194.17 Advocate for the Respondent No. 4 in W. P. No. 6178 of 2017. Shri A. M. Gaikwad, Advocate for the Respondent No. 5 in W. P. No. 6187 of 2017.

Shri P. P. Shahane, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 in W. P. No. 6188 of 2017.

Shri Nitin S. Kadam, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 in W. P. No. 6190 of 2017 and W. P. No. 6192 of 2017. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.

DATE : 28TH FEBRUARY, 2018.

FINAL ORDER :

.

Heard.

2.

The issue involved in the present Writ Petitions is no longer res-integra and is decided by this Court vide order dated 14.8.2014 in W. P. No.4536 of 2014 and other connected Writ Petitions.

3.

In view of the above, we also follow the same course. 4.

The view taken by the Scrutiny Committee deserves to be upheld. However, in the facts and circumstances, we proceed to issue certain directions in addition to the directions issued by the Scrutiny Committee as follows.

(a) The petitioners, in these petitions, may approach the concerned Scrutiny Committees for issuance of

5 wp 6194.17 photostat copy of the caste/tribe certificate produced by them for verification, within a period of four months from today. The Scrutiny Committee, on receipt of such applications, issue attested/authenticated copy of the caste/tribe certificate produced by respective petitioners for verification to the Committee.

(b) The respective petitioners, on receipt of photostat copy of the caste/tribe certificate, shall approach the concerned Sub Divisional Officer/competent authority with an application for issuance of caste/tribe certificate within a period of six weeks, thereafter.

(c) In the event earlier caste certificates had been issued by the Executive Magistrates, it would be open for the petitioners to tender an application to the Sub Divisional Officer of the concerned Division and such officer shall entertain the application and shall issue caste certificate/s in the prescribed proforma on verifying attested/authenticated photostat copy of the earlier caste certificate.

(d) The concerned Sub Divisional Officer/Competent Authority, on receipt of the applications by respective petitioners, together with attested/authenticated

6 wp 6194.17 photostat copy of the caste/tribe certificate issued earlier, shall proceed to issue caste/tribe certificate in prescribed proforma certifying that respective petitioners belong to 'Mannervarlu', Scheduled Tribe. The Sub Divisional Officers/Competent Authority shall issue certificates within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the applications.

(e) On receipt of Tribe certificates, respective petitioners, shall approach the concerned Scrutiny Committees with a proposal in prescribed proforma requesting the Scrutiny Committees to verify the Tribe Certificate and consider their applications for issuance of validity certificates. The respective petitioners shall approach the Scrutiny Committee within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the caste certificate from the competent authority.

(f) On receipt of the proposal from respective petitioners, the Scrutiny committee shall proceed to verify the caste/tribe certificate and take appropriate decision after following procedure prescribed under law in respect of issuance of validity certificates, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of one year from the date of receipt of the proposal/application.

7 wp 6194.17 (g) The Scrutiny Committee shall accept the proposals directly and shall not refuse to accept the proposals on the ground that same have not been routed through proper channel, either employer or educational institutions. (h) The respective education institutions/colleges or the employers shall not take any adverse action against any of the petitioners only on the ground of their failure to produce validity certificate and further appropriate action can be taken only subject to result of verification claim, which would be lodged before the Scrutiny Committee, in accordance with the directions issued in this judgment. 5.

The writ petitions stand disposed of accordingly. No costs. [A. M. DHAVALE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] bsb/Feb. 18