Digambar Vishwanath Bodewar v. Maharashtra State Board Of Secondary And Higher Secondary Education Through Its Divisional Secretar

1 WP 12531­2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.12531 OF 2017 Digambar Vishwanath Bodewar

...Petitioner

Versus

Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Through Its Divisional Secretary

...Respondent

­­­­ Mr. P. P. Uttarwar, Advocate for petitioner Ms. Sakshi Joshi, Advocate holding for Mrs. Surekha Mahajan, Advocate for respondent ­­­­ CORAM : R. M. BORDE & SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI. JJ.

DATE : 07­11­2017 PER COURT :

1.

The petitioner appeared for H.S.C. examination in the year 2008 and is shown to have been failed in three subjects. A proposal tendered after lapse of eight years, has been rightly turned down by the H.S.C. board relying upon Rule No.102 which prescribes limitation for recording correction of six months.

2.

There is absolutely no explanation as to why the proposal has been moved after lapse of eight years. The request made by the

2 WP 12531­2017 petitioner has been rightly turned down by the H.S.C. board. 3.

No interference is called for in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction by this court under Article 226 of Constitution of India. 4.

Writ petition is devoid of merits, hence stands rejected. [SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] [R. M. BORDE] JUDGE JUDGE vjg/­.