Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation Beed v. The State Of Mah And ORS

(1) C. A. No. 6841 of 2007 & Group

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6841 OF 2007 IN FAST/14966/2007 WITH CA/6838/2007 IN FAST/14829/2007 WITH CA/6844/2007 IN FAST/14961/2007 WITH CA/6848/2007 IN FAST/14986/2007 WITH CA/6853/2007 IN FAST/14974/2007 WITH CA/6856/2007 IN FAST/14954/2007 WITH CA/6862/2007 IN FAST/14952/2007 WITH CA/6865/2007 IN FAST/14968/2007 GODAVARI MARATHWADA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BEED

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS .........................

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. T. B. Bhosale Addl. Govt. Pleader for the Non-applicant - State : Mr. S.B. Yawalkar. Advocate for for Non-applicant nos.2A to 2D : Mr. L.S. Shaikh h/f. Mr. D.R. Jayabhar ..........................

CORAM : A.M. BADAR, J.

DATE : 10TH DECEMBER 2015 PER COURT :

1.

These are applications for grant of leave to the applicant to file an appeal challenging the award of the reference Court. 2.

Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the applicant as well as the learned Addl. Government Pleader for non-applicant - State and Mr.

(2) C. A. No. 6841 of 2007 & Group L.S. Shaikh, learned Counsel h/f. Mr. D.R. Jayabhar, learned Counsel for non-applicants - original claimants.

3.

The applicant - acquiring authority was not party to the reference proceedings. The learned reference Court has enhanced the amount of compensation. The burden of payment of compensation is on the applicant.

4.

Hence the Applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause "B" and the same are disposed of accordingly. ( A.M. BADAR ) JUDGE ................................

puranik / CA6841.07etc