Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation Beed v. The State Of Mah And ORS

(1) C. A. No. 6839 of 2007 & Group

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.

CA/6839/2007 IN FAST/14829/2007 WITH CA/6842/2007 IN FAST/14966/2007 WITH CA/6847/2007 IN FAST/14961/2007 WITH CA/6850/2007 IN FAST/14986/2007 WITH CA/6855/2007 IN FAST/14974/2007 WITH CA/6859/2007 IN FAST/14954/2007 WITH CA/6864/2007 IN FAST/14952/2007 WITH CA/6866/2007 IN FAST/14968/2007 GODAVARI MARATHWADA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BEED

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS .........................

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. T. B. Bhosale Addl. Govt. Pleader for the Non-applicant - State : Mr. S.B. Yawalkar. Advocate for for Non-applicant no.2 : Mr. L.S. Shaikh h/f. Mr. D.R. Jayabhar ..........................

CORAM : A.M. BADAR, J.

DATE : 10TH DECEMBER 2015 PER COURT :

1.

These are applications for condonation of delay of 199 days caused in filing appeals under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

2.

Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the applicant as well as the learned Addl. Government Pleader for non-applicant - State and Mr.

(2) C. A. No. 6839 of 2007 & Group L.S. Shaikh, learned Counsel h/f. Mr. D.R. Jayabhar, learned Counsel for non-applicants - original claimants.

3.

Perusal of the applications shows that the delay caused in filing appeals is sufficiently explained. Averments made in the applications are not controverted by filing counter affidavit. 4.

Hence for the stated reasons, Applications are allowed. Delay is condoned. First Appeals be registered. Applications are accordingly disposed of.

( A.M. BADAR ) JUDGE ................................

puranik / CA6839.07