Tatyerao Daultrao Shinde And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 Sr66&67WP10444.2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

WRIT PETITION NO. 10444 OF 2017 Narayan Bhagwat Bansode Died, His Lrs Rukmin Narayan Bansode & Ors.

... Petitioners

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents ..........

Mr S. S. Chillarge, Advocate for the petitioners Mr P. S. Patil, AGP for respondent/State .............

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10641 OF 2017 Tatyerao S/o Daulatrao Shinde & Ors.

... Petitioners

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents ..........

Mr S. S. Chillarge, Advocate for the petitioners Mr A. S. Shinde, AGP for respondent/State .............

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.

DATE : 14TH MARCH, 2018.

ORDER:

1.

Mr Chillarge, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, the rental compensation is not paid though notice has been given.

2 Sr66&67WP10444.2017 2.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that no such application has been filed by the petitioners. 3.

It appears that, advocate notice was issued to the authority seeking payment of rental compensation. It will be necessary for the petitioner to file comprehensive application seeking rental compensation because the Acquiring Body also will be required to be heard.

4.

The petitioners may file the application for compensation before the competent authority. If such application is filed by the petitioners seeking rental compensation, the competent authority shall decide the same on its own merits and after hearing all the parties concerned, decide it expeditiously, preferably within a period of nine months from the date of receipt of the application. 5.

The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No costs. [ A. M. DHAVALE ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE JUDGE Punde