← Library
Bombay High CourtFA/2773/2011dismissed

Executive Engineer, Jalna Monor Irrigation Division v. The State Of Mah Thr. Collector Jalna And ORS

2024-09-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO.2776/2011 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7365/2024IN FIRST APPEAL/2776/2011 Executive Engineer, Jalna minor Irrigation Div. Jalna

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and Oth.

...

Mrs. Asha Rakh, Advocate for the respondent No.3. ...

AND FIRST APPEAL NO.2773 of 2011 Executive Engineer, Jalna minor Irrigation Div. Jalna

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and Oth.

...

Mrs. Asha Rakh, Advocate for the respondent No.3/1 and 4. ...

AND FIRST APPEAL NO.2775 of 2011 Executive Engineer, Jalna minor Irrigation Div. Jalna

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and Oth.

...

Mrs. Asha Rakh, Advocate for the respondent No.3 and 4. ...

AND FIRST APPEAL NO.2772 of 2011 Executive Engineer, Jalna minor Irrigation Div. Jalna

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and Oth.

...

Mrs. Asha Rakh, Advocate for the respondent No.3. ...

AND FIRST APPEAL NO.2777 of 2011 Executive Engineer, Jalna minor Irrigation Div. Jalna

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and Oth.

...

Mrs. Asha Rakh, Advocate for the respondent No.3. ...

AND FIRST APPEAL NO.2779 of 2011

Executive Engineer, Jalna minor Irrigation Div. Jalna

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and Oth.

...

Mrs. Asha Rakh, Advocate for the respondent No.3. ...

AND FIRST APPEAL NO.2771 of 2011 Executive Engineer, Jalna minor Irrigation Div. Jalna

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and Oth.

...

Mrs. Asha Rakh, Advocate for the respondent No.3/1, 3/2. ...

AND FIRST APPEAL NO.2778 of 2011 Executive Engineer, Jalna minor Irrigation Div. Jalna

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and Oth.

...

Mrs. Asha Rakh, Advocate for the respondent No.3 and 4. ...

CORAM

: ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE : 28/04/2025 PER COURT :- 1.

Not on board. Taken on board.

2.

This Court by order dated 18.10.2024 has granted permission to carry out the amendment in the appeals. However, Mrs. Asha Rakh, learned counsel submits that inadvertently the amendment is carried out in the order dated 26.9.2024 instead of the appeals. The learned counsel therefore prays to carry out the amendment in the appeals. 3.

In view of the above, permission is granted to carry out the amendment in terms of order dated 18.10.2024. 4.

Motion is disposed of.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.] ssc/