Ramesh Fakira Kamble v. Nilkanth Chagan Tamboli Died Thru Lrs Bhushan Nilkanth Tamboli And Others

ca8640.16 (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8640 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2170 OF 2012 Ramesh s/o Fakira Kamble ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

Nilkanth s/o Chagan Tamoli (Died), Through its Legal Heirs & ors.

..RESPONDENTS Ms Surekha Mahajan, Advocate for applicant;

Mr R.R. Mantri, Advocate for respondents no.1-a to 2-d; Mr S.M. Ganachari, A.G.P. for respondents no.3 to 8; Mr M.G. Kochar, Advocate for respondents mo.9 (a) to 9(f), 10 (a) to 10 (e), 11 (a) to 11 (g), 12, 13 (a) to 13 (f), 14 & 15 CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 15th September, 2017 ORAL ORDER:

Since the applicant-intervenor has purchased the property, in my opinion, it will be appropriate to allow intervention. Intervenor be added as party respondent to the petition.

2.

Petitioners to carry out appropriate amendment within a period of two weeks from today.

3.

Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly. (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) amj