← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1894/2020disposed offdismissed for default

Sadia Sultana Khan Lrs Ayesha Fatima Siddi Khaja Ahmedullah Khan Thr Gpa Siddi Muzammil Ahmed v. Abhijit Sharadrao Patil And Others

2020-02-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rohit B. Deo2 pages

(1) WP-1894 of 2020.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 19 WRIT PETITION NO.1894 OF 2020 SADIA SULTANA KHAN LRS AYESHA FATIMA SIDDI KHAJA AHMEDULLAH KHAN THR GPA SIDDI MUZAMMIL AHMED

VERSUS

ABHIJIT SHARADRAO PATIL AND OTHERS ...

Mr. Umakant Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioners. ...

CORAM :

Rohit B. Deo, J.

DATE :

4th February 2020.

ORDER :- .

The petition is misconceived.

2.

The petitioner is challenged the order dated 27.12.2017 whereby the Additional Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad refused to review the order dated 05.07.2016. 3.

I do not see any error in the order impugned. 4.

The order of which review was sought is the order of remand and the Tahsildar is directed to conduct fresh enquiry as regards the claim of the respondents that they are the tenants.

5.

The Tahsildar is expected to conduct the enquiry as expeditiously as possible and in any event to complete the same with twelve (12) months.

(2) WP-1894 of 2020.odt 6.

Subject to above, the petition is disposed of. (ROHIT B. DEO, J.) VD_Dhirde