Pundalik Waman Gavali v. State Of Mah And ORS

( 1 ) wp 6622.05

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6622 OF 2005 PUNDALIK S/O WAMAN GAVALI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. S.P. Brahme AGP for Respondents: Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar ...

CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE :

21.08.2017 P.C. :- .

Motion is made for speaking to the minutes in respect of order dated 10.08.2017.

2.

In para no.2 one space for date is left blank, the learned counsel submits that the said date ought to be read as '01.07.1997', so also the learned counsel submits that in the same line instead of '01.07.2006' the date ought to be read as '01.07.2007', so also in the same order in para 7-D in line no.3 instead of word 'hall' the same ought to be read as 'shall'. The necessary corrections be carried out accordingly. Motion accordingly disposed of. [MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] mub