Snehal Yogesh Giri v. Yogesh Janardhan Giri
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 125 OF 2018 SNEHAL YOGESH GIRI
VERSUS
YOGESH JANARDHAN GIRI ...
Advocate for the Applicant : Shri D. M. Shinde Advocate for the Respondent : In person as respondent ...
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
DATED : 12th OCTOBER, 2018.
...
PER COURT :
1.
Shri Yogesh Janardan Giri/the respondent husband of the applicant has appeared today in response to the Court notice. I have permitted him to address the Court keeping in view that this is an issue pertaining to a husband and wife. I gave him an opportunity to think and state as to whether this marriage can be settled. He has submitted that considering the pleadings of the parties, it would not be possible to live together.
2.
He then submits that this application can be allowed in terms of prayer clause B and the proceedings can be
transferred to the Court of the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Hingoli. He further states that after transfer, the matter could be referred to a trained mediator for working out the modalities for separation of the parties. 3.
The learned Advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant, after transfer, may take a decision in this regard. 4.
In view of the above, this application is allowed in terms of prayer clause B which reads as under :- ''B. The proceedings of petition bearing No.A58/2018 pending before Hon'ble Family Court at Amravati may kindly be withdrawn from the file of Family Court, At Amravati and the same may kindly transferred to the court of Civil Judge Senior Division, Hingoli or any other competent Civil Court At Hingoli for its disposal according to law.''
5.
Both the litigating sides would appear before the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Hingoli.
6.
The respondent/husband submits that he and the applicant can appear on 20/10/2018 before the said Court as another proceeding filed by the applicant/wife is posted on the said date and the applicant would be visiting Hingoli for the said purpose.
7.
Needless to state, the learned Court at Hingoli would ensure that both the proceedings are posted on the same date so as to enable the respondent/husband to attend the proceedings in a single visit.
(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) shp/-