← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/7371/2023disposed off

Amrut Ashruba Kadam v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others

2023-07-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 920 WRIT PETITION NO.7358 OF 2023 VARSHA MANOHARRAO GANGE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Menezes Joslyn A. AGP for Respondents : Mrs. M.A. Deshpande AND 924 WRIT PETITION NO.7371 OF 2023 AMRUT ASHRUBA KADAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Menezes Joslyn A AGP for Respondents : Mr. A.A. Jagatkar ...

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL & SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.

DATE : 05 JULY 2023 PC :

Heard both the sides finally.

2.

The petitioners are aggrieved by the orders passed by the Education Officer (Secondary), in their respective matters, whereby, he has refused to grant approval to their transfers from unaided division to aided division as contemplated under Rule 41 A of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 (for short 'the MEPS Rules').

3.

Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that in similar set of facts in the matter of Manik Tukaram Maske Versus The State of Maharashtra, in Writ Petition No. 9245 of 2021, by the order dated 10 March 2022, this Court had relegated the matter to the Education Officer for decision afresh to enable him to ascertain the factual position.

4.

In our considered view, the request is innocuous. It would also provide opportunity to the Education Officer to take appropriate steps, if there are indeed surplus teachers who are senior to the petitioners.

5.

The Writ Petitions are partly allowed. The impugned orders are quash and set aside. The respondent no. 3 - Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Beed, shall re-consider the issue afresh in the light of the provisions of Rule 41 A of the MEPS Rules. However, approval shall not be refused on the ground of circular dated 01 April 2021. The decision shall be taken as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of twelve weeks from today. [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL, J. ] spc/