Bombay High CourtWP/10448/2017disposed offdismissed for default

Keshav Nivrutti Rajarupe v. Babu Mahadu Rajarupe

2019-08-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge2 pages

{1} wp1044817.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.10448 OF 2017 Keshav s/o Nivrutti Rajarupe Petitioner

Versus

Babu s/o Mahadu Rajarupe Respondent Mr.A.N.Sabnis, advocate holding for Mr.V.D.Gunale, advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.N.P. Patil Jamalpurkar, advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

DATE : 26th August, 2019 PER COURT:

The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 12.04.2017, passed by the Additional Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad in ROR/Review Application No.299 of 2015, under Section 257 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, in connection with the mutation entry no.925.

Considering the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of Gurudassing Nawoosing Panjwani Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others, 2016 (5) MhLJ 12, the petitioner has a statutory remedy of filing a second revision before the State. No interim relief has been granted to the petitioner in this matter.

{2} wp1044817.odt In view of the above, this petition is disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to prefer a second revision. If such a proceeding is filed within a period of four weeks from today, the time spent by the petitioner in this petition from 02.05.2017 until four weeks from today, would be considered as a good ground for condonation of delay, if an issue of limitation arises. RAVINDRA V. GHUGE JUDGE adb/