← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/6254/2022delay condonatedrejected

Daluu Dagadu Patil And ANR v. The S.L.A.O. (1), U.T.P.H No. 1 Jalgaon And ANR

2022-09-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More1 pages

1 944 ca 6254-22

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 944 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6254 OF 2022 IN FAST/15752/2021 DALUU DAGADU PATIL AND ANR

VERSUS

THE S.L.A.O. (1), U.T.P.H NO. 1 JALGAON AND ANR ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Kale Ajeet B.

AGP for Respondent No.1: Mr. P. N. Kutti ....

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 28/09/2022.

P. C. :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The applicants are seeking condonation of delay of 1854 days, which is caused due to their poor fnancial condition. 3.

The learned counsel for the acquiring body strongly opposed the application that there is no proper reason of delay. 4.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and reasons stated in the application, the delay of 1854 days stands condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid period of delay. The appeal be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any. Civil application is accordingly disposed of.

( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-